Introduction

           Early childhood establishments are relationship-founded organisations (Bertacchi, 1996). Their merchandise is service to families and children anchored in sympathetic relationships. Relationship-founded organisations are embodied by principles of reverence for the individual, understanding to context, dedication to developing growth and change, affinity of mutual objectives, open devotion to reflecting on vocation, and placing standards for the staff with reference to values and ethics. All of these principles can be cared for by creating an inclusionary vision recognized by all the stakeholders. It is an orientation which can be revisited recurrently, in particular at periods of transformation or pressure (Bertacchi, 1996).

           This study intends to look into the development of the early childhood education in Britain along with the issues and challenges that it faced. Moreover, the paper also intends to present the courses of action conducted by the government in order to deal with the issues relating to early child education. The study will be using past and existing studies regarding early childhood education to discuss the development in the case of Britain.

Contemporary Early Childhood Education in Britain

           Early childhood education for youngsters started to materialize in England in the late 18th century on a charitable and benevolent origin. In 1816, the initial nursery school in the United Kingdom was instituted at New Lanark in Scotland by Robert Owen (1771-1858) for the young offspring of the cotton mill workforce. Children ages 1 to 6 were looked after while their parents and elder brothers and sisters toiled in the cotton mills. Owen supported free and amorphous play in the learning of young individuals and did not push for formal education. He attempted to generate a prospective citizen in the course of the development of informal education and physical actions. Even though Owen’s philosophies were ahead of his time, his exemplar roused a noteworthy curiosity in early childhood education and the beginning of a significant number of infant schools in Britain.

           Passage of the Education Act of 1870 was an imperative event for the reason that the action instituted necessary elementary schools for all broods from the age of 5. In the year 1880, elementary education turned out to be compulsory for all offspring between the ages of 5 and 13. In the non-existence of special establishments for younger children, elementary schools acknowledged children younger than 5 years old, to look after them from the unfortunate and damaging physical circumstances of slum residences and hazardous roads. In the year of 1905, five women inspectors from the Board of Education appraised the admittance of newborns to elementary schools as well as the set of courses employed to tutor them. These inspectors accounted the unsuitability of such stipulation for these young children and suggested that children under the age of 5 have detached amenities and a dissimilar teaching method from older children (Board of Education, 1905). The appraisers disapproved of the prominence on repetitive recurrence and rote memorization in the elementary school core curriculum. In consequence of this report, children under 5 were authoritatively left out from elementary schools.

           In 1911, Margaret McMillan (1860-1931) and her sister Rachel instituted an outdoor nursery for impoverished kids in Deptford. McMillan's educational paradigm was motivated by her socialist principles (Blackstone, 1971). She was worried for the physical condition and well-being of the children of blue-collar class, and she pressed the necessity for health care with appropriate sustenance, sanitation, exercise, and fresh air. Her nursery permitted free admission to play areas and grounds and was not based upon a permanent time schedule. McMillan's techniques, with her highlighting on fresh air, work out, and sustenance, still have an effect on some features of contemporary English nursery practice (Curtis, 1998).

           By the 1960s, the diminishing in family size and the shutting down of day nurseries subsequent to the Second World War had decreased the protects for children to play with other children. Simultaneously, responsiveness of the educational importance of play may have developed into a more extensive case. It was impracticable for Local Education Authorities (LEAs) to augment the quantity of nurseries, for the reason that the Ministry of Education Circular 8/60 affirmed that there may possibly be no extension of nursery school provision (Cleave & Jowett, 1982). For the duration of this phase, the deficiency of LEA provision of nursery consignments and increasing parental attention in young children’s wellbeing and schooling generated a new-fangled category of preschool provision: playgroups. The foundation of the playgroup movement is associated to Belle Tutaev, a London mother, who in 1961 prepared a nursery assemblage for her small offspring in a church foyer, dividing the responsibilities of child care with a neighbour. The educational establishments received the playgroup movement as an economical alternative for nursery schools.

           In the year of 1972, Margaret Thatcher, as Secretary of State for Education, tendered a White Paper on education entitled "Education: A Framework for Expansion" (Department of Education and Science, 1972). The White Paper recommended that nursery education be supplied for all who sought after it, stating that by 1980 there would be nursery school consignments for 50% of 3-year-olds and 90% of 4-year-olds. Nevertheless, this pledged nursery development was not imminent for the reason of the economic depression. All the way through the 1970s and 1980s, non-statutory preschool stipulation was deserted and undeveloped.

           The Rumbold Report (DES, 1990) and the Royal Society of Arts Report (Ball, 1994) similarly pressed the significance of excellence in early years education. The Rumbold report suggested a curriculum anchored on eight main parts of learning, following in the route of a recent HMI (Her Majesty's Inspectorate) journal The Curriculum from 5 to 16 (DES, 1985). These important parts are categorized by the report as the artistic and creative; human and social; speech and literacy; mathematics; physical; science; spiritual and moral; and technology (DES, 1990). On the other hand, the Royal Society of Arts Report (Ball, 1994) suggested that first-class provision be made accessible to all 3- and 4-year-olds, reconsidering indications that first-class early education brings about long-lasting cognitive and social advantages in children. Ball set off the several major fundamentals for first-class provision. These includes a suitable early learning set of courses; the assortment, tuition, and stability of staff; strong staff to children ratios; establishments and equipment premeditated for early learning; and a cooperative function for parents.

           In 1996, the Conservative administration pioneered the first phase of a Nursery Voucher system connected to a set of guiding principles for pre-statutory situations this is labelled as the Desirable Outcomes for Children’s Learning on Entering Compulsory Education (SCAA, 1996). From the time when the opening of the Voucher system and Desirable Outcomes, early childhood education has developed into a concern on the national policy list of items, and there have been noteworthy developments in the implementations and policies of early childhood education. The Voucher system permitted parents to employ vouchers valued up to £1,100 per individual child for up to three periods of part-time education for their 4-year-old offspring, in any structure of preschool stipulation. With the purpose of register for the reception of vouchers, preschool conditions had to demonstrate that they were conveying the children in the direction of the Desirable Outcomes as stated by the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (SCAA, 1996). The Desirable Outcomes are education objectives that children have to realize prior to their entrance compulsory schooling. They give emphasis to early literacy, numeracy, and the improvement of personal and social proficiency, and they subscribe to children’s awareness, appreciation, and skills in other fields.

           Nevertheless, in 1997, the incoming Labour Government put an end to the voucher system and prepared its own arrangements for the improvement of early year services. The new administration attempted to elevate criterions and considerably augmented public financial support of early years education. The administration tendered direct financial support to preschool organizations for part-time consignments for 4-year-old youngsters and an escalating amount of part-time places for 3-year-old kids. On the other hand, the reception of this financial support for 3- and 4-year-old youngsters is reliant on each preschool provision satisfying government prerequisites for the customary inspection of preschool situations, in congruence to the structure of Desirable Outcomes, now revised as Early Learning Goals (QCA, 2000).

The Current Curriculum

           The Education Reform Act for the initial time set off a National Curriculum for England and Wales in the year of 1988. It offered an extensive reformation of the educational structure in England. The most significant rationalizations for the National Curriculum are improving the criterion in schools and tendering a comprehensive and even-handed curriculum (Moon, 1994). Before the 1988 Education Reform Act, the education arrangement was decentralized, with modest government involvement in curriculum preparation and execution. On the other hand, since the introduction of the National Curriculum, government involvement has augmented and teachers’ self-sufficiency has subsequently diminished (Cox, 1996). From its launch, the subject-founded method of the National Curriculum has been perceived as an assault on conventional child-concentrated preschool education. Even though the National Curriculum is only applicable solely to students of compulsory school age, its institution has unavoidably had an impact upon agenda for children under statutory school age (Blenkin & Kelly, 1994; Moss & Penn, 1996).

           An additional noteworthy reform in English early childhood education was the institution of the structure for early years education characterized by the Desirable Outcomes for Children’s Learning (SCAA, 1996). At that occasion, augmenting the benchmarks and developing quality in early childhood organizations were public priorities in policy making. The unambiguous prospect of this SCAA publication was that preschool schooling programs would facilitate children to arrive at the desirable results by compulsory school age.

           The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA, 1999) substituted the Desirable Outcomes with Early Learning Goals by the year of 1999. Nevertheless, the Early Learning Goals (QCA, 1999) do not hold opposing views on a significant level from the Desirable Learning Outcomes and hold on to the similar six areas of learning. The noteworthy development, in the context of the set of courses, is that the Early Learning Goals correspond to what most children are anticipated to accomplish by the conclusion of the foundation stage, which is defined as the age of 3 to the ending of the reception year, as opposed to on arriving at compulsory school age. The government set up a Foundation Stage of early learning, which is a contemporary stage of schooling for children age 3 to the conclusion of their reception year when they will be 5, going up to 6. The end result is that the preceding national curriculum projected for 3- and 4-year-olds broadens to take in 5-year-olds.

           By the advent of the new millennium, Curriculum Guidance for the Foundation Stage was printed and released by the Department for Education and Employment and the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA, 2000). The curriculum guidance is projected to assist specialists plan to satisfy the assorted requirements of all children so that the majority will achieve and some, where suitable, will go further than the early learning objectives by the conclusion of the foundation stage (p. 5). It is noteworthy that even though the curriculum guidance maintains to explain integrated learning, it similarly gives emphasis to literacy and numeracy as distinctive curriculum fields. The curriculum guidance sets off the substance of each field in three parts. These parts include the "Stepping Stones;" the second is the "Examples of What Children Do;" and the third is termed as "What Does the Practitioner Need to Do?" The manuscript of the "Stepping Stones" starts out the early learning objectives for each field of learning. The instances of "What Children Do" demonstrate the manner in which children of dissimilar ages are improving. The sector "What Does the Practitioner Need to Do?" presents the manner in which the specialist can configure and supply suitable activities.

           As a component of the latest improvements in early childhood education, the government initiated inspection of preschool situations by the Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED). OFSTED is a non-ministerial governmental division, self-regulating part of the Department of Education and Skills, accountable for examining all schools and early years provision acquiring the government’s financial support in England. The objective of the OFSTED’s inspection procedure is to guarantee government, parents, and the public that government funded nursery schooling is of acceptable excellence (OFSTED, 2001). Every category of preschool condition that desires to agree to government’s financial support is obliged to undertake an inspection by OFSTED. This examination appraises the degree to which the preschool settings are working in the direction of the Early Learning Goals.

           The inspectors employs an assortment of methods to come to their conclusions, as well as inspection of activities, assessment of resources, evaluation of documentary confirmation, and dialogue with the staff and children. At the conclusion of the inspection episode, the lead inspector provides an oral response on the examination, and within weeks, the preschool acquires the inspection account. It is important that the inspection account is a public document and accessible on the Internet. If the preschool location does not satisfy the inspection prerequisites, financial support may be inhibited. Therefore, early years teachers encounter great pressure to encourage specific and prespecified learning results, many of which concentrate on literacy and numeracy.

           With the English government calls for elevating standards, preschool teachers are obliged to abide by OFSTED inspection standards. Smidt (2002) similarly contended that by reason of the government course of action to elevate excellence and standards, children are required to gain knowledge of things by rote, colour in spreadsheets, and normally be submissive in numerous learning conditions. The institution of curriculum guidance for the foundation period, in conjunction with the statutory inspection procedure, seems to have had a strong pressure on preschool education in England. Even though there is an ongoing contention on the subject of their suitability, the Early Learning Goals have been extensively recognized as the foundation for activity in preschool settings.

Conclusion

           This paper has looked at the varying curriculum for early childhood education in Britain. The study has presented that conventional early childhood schooling in England has been child concentrated contrary to models that are subject concentrated and instructor absorbed. Conventional early childhood education has given emphasis on individual children’s welfare, free play, direct knowledge, and integrated education. Nonetheless, in 1996, the government brought in a framework for an early years curriculum, reclassified the child-concentrated educational paradigm, and instigated improvements for raising standards. The national preschool curriculum structure (Early Learning Goals) highlights not only integrated scholarship but also literacy and numeracy. The structure similarly identifies specific accomplishments to be anticipated of 4- and 5-year-olds. Regardless of the advantages and pitfalls of the correctness of the structure, more formal tuition in literacy and numeracy instruction is being unswervingly and circuitously enforced upon young children. Government schemes and assessment have commenced to modify the conventional character of English preschool situation.

References

Ball, Christopher. (1994). Start right: The importance of early learning. London: Royal Society of Arts.

Bertacchi, J. (1996) Relationship-based organisations. Zero-To-Three, 17 (2), 2-7.

Blackstone, Tessa. (1971). A fair start: The provision of pre-school education. Harmondsworth,           England: Penguin Press.

Blenkin, Geva M., & Kelly, A. V. (1994). Early childhood education: A developmental curriculum.           London: Paul Chapman.

Board of Education. (1905). Report on children under five years of age in public elementary schools.           London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO).

Cleave, Shirley, & Jowett, Sandra. (1982). And so to school: A study of continuity from pre-school to           infant school. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson.

Cox, Theo. (1996). The national curriculum in the early years: Challenges and opportunities. London:           Falmer Press.

Curtis, Audrey. (1998). A curriculum for the pre-school child. London: Routledge.

Department of Education and Science (DES). (1972). Education: A framework for expansion. London:           HMSO.

Department of Education and Science (DES). (1985). The curriculum from 5 to 16. London: HMSO.

Department of Education and Science (DES). (1990). Starting with quality. London: Author.

Moon, Bob. (1994). A guide to the national curriculum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Moss, Peter, & Penn, Helen. (1996). Transforming nursery education. London: Paul Chapman.

Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED). (2001). OFSTED’s nursery education [Online]. London:           Author. Available: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk

Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). (1999). Early learning goals. London: Author.

Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). (2000). Curriculum guidance for the foundation stage.           London: Author.

School Curriculum Assessment Authority (SCAA). (1996). Nursery education: Desirable outcomes for           children’s learning on entering compulsory education. London: SCAA and Department for           Education and Employment.